Dua


I received several responses to the honor killing video that I had posted a few days ago. Everybody who saw that video was disgusted, enraged, extremely disturbed, that’s of course expected, after all most of us are not talibanistic mullahs.

I was, however, more interested in what lied beyond the first reaction. That’s where things become interesting and way more controversial. I asked myself, was the act justified, am I merely protesting the manner in which it was performed? Had it been ordained by a Shariah court and performed by a state employed executioner, would it then be justified? After all, Iranian courts have done it and so have Arab ones, Pakistanis came very close to copying their Muslim brethren too. Shia-Sunni bhai bhai.

Isn’t it a ghuna-i-kabeera (major sin) to have sexual relations outside of wedlock, isn’t it punishable by death and that too death by stoning (it is under the shariah laws, note that Allah himself may forgive the fornicator, his believers won’t)? The faithfuls among us passionately spit and throw stones at the Iblis (satin) during Haj, didn’t Dua through her (alleged) act personify devil? Then why the shocked look, the red face, the teary eyes, the bullshit. There are few among us Muslim expatriates who would give you straight answers to these questions – fear of being stereotyped, labeled jahil (backward, ignorant, illiterate) in one’s own community or being reported to the overeager FBI are just a few factors among a myriad of reasons.

Why stop at this, let’s go a step further. This is going to offend a lot of people, that’s certainly not my intention but well. Let’s say you are a conservative Muslim (no, not a Mullah, just one among a conservative majority) living in one of the conservative Muslim states (pick your favorite from Middle Eastern states, Sudan, Iran, Afghanistan or Pakistan). Let’s say one day you are tired and take off early from work. Your servant had fixed the front door so it doesn’t make the creaking sound when opened. As you open the door and enter you house, you hear a sound coming from inside the servant quarter. You think to yourself, isn’t the bugger off today, I thought I let him go to see his dying mother. Now you are really suspicious, you rush to the servant quarter, stop right outside it and then with one swift kick blow open the door. There on the bed is your daughter with a boy in a compromising position.

What happens then? Well, it really depends. Depends first on who the boy is. If he belongs to a social class lower than yours, your rage will be uncontrollable, you’ve just been a victim of a double whamy, the bastard is likely to get killed or at least beaten up beyond recognition. If, however, he belongs to the rich and the privileged, it’s not him but you who is in trouble, you better control your rage, show some superficial anger and let the guy run away before you bring some real sense to your daughter. Society wants you to exact a severe revenge but interestingly your anger is expected to be directed more towards your daughter than the guy with her, after all she has to be the pure one, boys will be boys. Isn’t that why we put burqas on our women so that their curves don’t entice us to sin. Isn’t it a woman’s responsibility to protect herself from our prying eyes and overcharged imaginations. We know our lust hath no end but that it’s not our fault, that’s what makes us men (head high with pride) and here is your daughter willingly engaged in a sexual intercourse with a boy.

What do to? Hide it under the carpet as if it never happened, get the two married, kill your daughter or kill yourself. If you let them go easy, everyone will know about this, you know the boy will talk, you will no longer be known by your name but as that ghashti’s (whore) father, you will be shunned from the society, you will eventually have to move to a place where no one knows your name. For the same reason, you cannot report it to the police. However, if you kill your daughter out of izat (honor) right there on the spot, you will be lauded as the real man, the father among fathers, people will tell stories of your courage for years. You will probably be caught, damn the so-called modern laws. But when in jail, you will get VIP (Very Important Person) treatment, you were a nobody before and now you are an example for a generation of fathers and brothers. Mullahs will probably seize the opportunity and hold massive rallies in your support. Depending on how religious the reigning government is and how much international attention your case gets, you would probably be in jail anywhere from 2-10 years. Most likely, the human rights organizations will lose interest in a year or so, the pesky amnesty guys will probably hang around for a little longer but they too will eventually be pursuaded away by the hot off the press human rights violation (what would these fucking goras know about honor anyway, they sleep with each other’s wives, jahanumee), the once emotional petitioners will graduate from their respective schools and you’ll probably get out unharmed, why would you not, after all you did the honorable thing… Stop thinking now, be a man, just do it!

So no more shit face please. Go back, play the movie and this time enjoy it, that’s the honorable thing to do.

I met Dr. Sureya Sayadi a couple of days ago at a restaurant in Fremont. We had quite a heated debate,I disagree with a lot of what she believes in, she did have some valid points though. Here is the video from her website. CNN couldn’t show more than two minutes of it, here you can see the whole 10 minutes.

Video of honor killing of Du’a Khalil in Iraq

Warning: This video contains extremely disturbing images.

If you thought there was a limit to the barbarism man is capable of, think again. A 17 year old Kurdish girl by the name of Du’a is stoned to death for allegedly having an affair with a sunni boy. She is dragged to the middle of a bazaar by her own cousin and then brutally stoned to death while a large crowd of men not only watch but actively participate in the act. It is important to note that despite the chants of Allah-O-Akbar in the movie, this murder has nothing to do with Islam. Also this was not done in the name of Islam. The Yezidi tribe that this poor girl belonged to is held captive by its savage traditions. Yezidis have been persecuted for centuries by many different civilizations. Even after many migrations and forced Islamization by the Ottomans, they have kept their traditions.

What drives an otherwise sane human being to ruthlessly kill another person and that too one of his own family? Is it honor? But what is honor anyway and why is it restored by taking a human life. Generally we like to shrug away such incidents as acts of savagery by the illiterate, the unenlightened among us. Depending on the flavor of stereotyping you subscribe to, you might be inclined to think that this was just another barbaric act by the savage Arabs. Such simple explanations, however, are constantly being challenged in the world we live in. We can’t explain it that easily, there probably isn’t one size that fits all. What drives a student in a prestigious institution such as Virginia Tech to systematically murder so many of his class mates is probably a very different emotion than the one that motivates a suicide bomber in Baghdad to take his life. or is it? Would a terrorist be able to do it if he didn’t have the comfort of a gun or a bomb to shield himself with, if instead all his victims were tied down and he had to stone and maim each one to death. Would he be able to bear the screams of innocent children. The men who participated in stoning this innocent girl or those that slaughtered Daniel Pearl are at some level more savage than the suicide bombers or the carpet bombers. They don’t have to visualize the consequence of their action, they can see it. They have to live it and live with it. And yet they do it.

This should remind us once again how fundamentalist beliefs in any ideology be it religious, tradition, nationalism or caste can drive men to commit unspeakable acts of horror. We witnessed that in Holocaust against the Jews, US plundering in Viet Nam, Pakistanis slaughtering Bengalis, genocide of Muslims in Bosnia and of Tutsis in Rawanda and last but not least the ongoing genocide in Darfur. Actors change yet the plot remains the same.

Is it really ideology though, I am not so sure. Would a suicide bomber still be impelled solely by his beliefs to take so many lives if he was *not* to become a hero in his own community. Is it his way of standing out, if not in life then in death. Is he thus at the core driven by the same emotion that drives a painter to paint a master piece? I don’t think it’s only the seventy virgins, they are the consequence not the cause. At the end of the day, it’s very selfish, very worldly. Religion, God, Tradition, etc. are all slogans, excuses used to pacify one’s own conscience. It’s not even revenge, revenge is futile unless it’s accompanied by glory. “Honor” needs an audience, it’s not won and lost in isolation.